ADVERTISEMENT
The Trump administration has intensified its campaign against Cuba’s long-standing communist government, highlighted by the recent arrest and planned deportation of a relative of a senior Cuban official.
On May 22, 2026, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations arrested Adys Lastres Morera in Miami. She is the sister of Ania Guillermina Lastres Morera, executive president of Grupo de Administración Empresarial S.A. (GAESA), a military-controlled conglomerate that U.S. officials say dominates a significant portion of Cuba’s economy.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that he personally revoked Lastres Morera’s lawful permanent resident status, which had been granted in January 2023. Officials determined that her presence in the United States posed a threat to American foreign policy interests due to alleged ties to the Cuban regime and GAESA’s operations. She remains in ICE custody pending deportation proceedings.
Rubio Emphasizes Policy Shift on Regime Family Members
In a statement, Rubio emphasized a shift in policy: “For far too long, the family members of … repressive anti-American regimes … have been given a free pass to enjoy the privileges of living in the United States.” He noted that the administration is now targeting relatives of Cuban military elites and others linked to groups it views as threats to U.S. national security.
The action forms part of a broader strategy toward Latin America, sometimes referred to within the administration as the “Donroe Doctrine,” which places a strong emphasis on U.S. interests in the Western Hemisphere. Rubio, a Florida native of Cuban descent and former senator, has been a central figure in shaping these policies.
Additional measures include efforts to restrict Venezuelan oil shipments to Cuba, contributing to reported fuel shortages and economic difficulties on the island. Last week, federal prosecutors unsealed an indictment against former Cuban President Raúl Castro, charging him in connection with the 1996 downing of civilian aircraft operated by Miami-based exiles, an incident that killed four people, including three Americans.
Broader Confrontational Approach Signals Escalation
Cuba’s government, in power since the 1959 revolution led by Fidel Castro, has faced decades of U.S. sanctions. The Trump administration’s moves signal a more confrontational approach aimed at increasing pressure on Havana’s leadership. Cuban officials have condemned the actions as interference in their internal affairs.
As these developments unfold, observers are watching closely to see whether the combined economic, legal, and diplomatic pressures will lead to significant changes in Cuba or further escalation in U.S.-Cuba relations. The administration has indicated readiness to support the Cuban people amid the island’s ongoing challenges, while maintaining a firm stance against the current regime.
At its core, it raises major constitutional and legal questions about the scope of presidential authority, the limits of political speech, and the accountability of public officials. Legal analysts note that the courts will be tasked with determining where protected political expression ends and potential criminal liability begins.
Trump has denied wrongdoing and has repeatedly criticized the prosecution. His attorneys argue that the case represents an improper use of the justice system for political purposes and maintain that his actions were lawful efforts to challenge election outcomes through public statements, legal filings, and advocacy.
The defense contends that these activities fall within protections guaranteed by the Constitution, particularly the First Amendment.
Constitutional and Legal Implications
As the case moves through pretrial proceedings, motions, and possible appeals, it continues to attract intense national attention. Supporters of the prosecution view the trial as a necessary test of whether even the highest officeholders can be held accountable under the law. Critics, however, warn that the case could set a precedent that risks drawing political disputes into the criminal justice system.
The outcome is expected to have lasting implications for American politics and constitutional law
Future Political Precedent
Whatever the final verdict, legal experts believe the ruling could help define the boundaries of presidential conduct during contested elections and shape how future administrations handle post-election challenges and disputes.
Headlines spread fast—sometimes faster than the facts themselves. Recently, a viral post claimed that “30 minutes ago in Utah, Charlie Kirk’s wife was confirmed as…” and framed it as an official appointment to a prominent position. Supporters and critics alike rushed to react, flooding social media with speculation.
But is it true? What do we actually know about Charlie Kirk’s wife, her civic involvement, and whether she holds an official role in Utah? Let’s unpack the facts, the context, and the bigger picture behind this type of viral political story.
Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, is a well-known conservative activist with a strong presence in political media. His wife, Erika Frantzve, is recognized for her involvement in civic and community projects.
Who Is Erika Kirk?
Erika is a former Miss Arizona USA.
She has pursued graduate studies in Christian ministries and law.
She is active in faith-based initiatives, philanthropy, and business ventures.
She has been vocal about community engagement and social issues through podcasts and nonprofit work.
Her public profile has grown alongside Charlie Kirk’s, making her a recognizable figure within certain circles of American civic life.
The headline circulating online claimed that Erika Kirk (Charlie Kirk’s wife) was “confirmed to a prominent role in Utah”—but offered no specifics about the office, the department, or the official authority confirming the appointment.
What Evidence Exists?
No official press release: Confirmations to state roles are typically announced by the governor’s office, legislature, or relevant state agencies.
No mainstream media coverage: Outlets like the Salt Lake Tribune, Deseret News, or AP News Utah would cover such an appointment immediately.
No government record: Utah maintains public records of state board, commission, and agency appointments, none of which list Erika Kirk.
Without these elements, the claim appears more like a viral rumor than a verified fact.
To understand why this matters, it helps to know how political appointments are usually confirmed in U.S. states:
Governor’s Office Announcement: Appointments to state commissions, boards, or high-level offices are released through the governor’s press office.
Legislative Confirmation: Some roles require approval by the state legislature, which is publicly recorded.
Agency Publication: State agencies often update their websites with rosters of newly appointed officials.
Media Coverage: Local and national outlets verify and report such developments.
How Political Appointment News Is Normally Confirmed
In Utah, all of these steps are transparent. The absence of Erika Kirk’s name in any of these contexts strongly suggests the viral headline is not factual.
It’s not unusual for the spouses of political or media figures to become subjects of speculation. In many cases, their visibility in civic or nonprofit spaces leads people to assume or exaggerate official influence.
Name recognition: Familiar figures generate clicks and attention.
Political polarization: Supporters and opponents alike may share unverified claims to fit their narratives.
Blurred lines: Civic activism, nonprofit leadership, and government roles are often confused in online discussions.
Social media amplification: Once a headline gains traction, repetition gives it the illusion of credibility.
In this case, Erika Kirk’s genuine civic involvement may have fueled assumptions that she had been officially appointed to public office.
Why Rumors About Political Spouses Spread
At present, there is no credible evidence that Erika Kirk has been confirmed to any state position in Utah. Neither Utah’s governor’s office nor any official government source has made such an announcement.
Instead, the viral post appears to be an example of misleading framing—taking a person’s civic activities or associations and presenting them as government confirmation. This practice is not only misleading but also contributes to public confusion.
For readers who encounter dramatic political claims online, here are reliable steps to separate fact from fiction:
Utah Governor’s Office announcements
Utah State Legislature records
If major local or national outlets haven’t reported the news, chances are it hasn’t happened.
Phrases like “prominent role,” “officially confirmed,” or “shocking announcement” without details are red flags.
Often, viral claims originate from small blogs, partisan pages, or social media accounts with no track record of accuracy.
Websites like AP Fact Check, PolitiFact, and Snopes often review high-traffic rumors.
The Reality: No Verified Appointment in Utah
Misinformation about political figures and their families can:
Mislead the public about who holds power.
Distract from real policy debates.
Undermine trust in journalism and government institutions.
Fuel unnecessary polarization.
Ensuring accuracy protects not just individuals like Erika Kirk, but the integrity of public discourse overall.
Even if Erika Kirk has not been confirmed to a Utah role, it’s worth noting that spouses of political figures often play important roles in civic life. From Eleanor Roosevelt’s advocacy during FDR’s presidency to modern first spouses’ work in education, health, and community service, the contributions of political partners are significant.
Cultural and heritage projects
Erika Kirk’s involvement in faith-based and community projects fits into this broader tradition of civic engagement without requiring official state confirmation.
Despite the lack of verification, social media platforms lit up with reactions to the viral Utah headline. Some celebrated the supposed news as a win for civic leadership, while others critiqued it as nepotism or political favoritism.
How to Fact-Check Headlines Like This
This rapid polarization underscores the problem: unverified stories drive emotional responses before the facts are clear.
The case of Charlie Kirk’s wife and the Utah confirmation rumor highlights the urgent need for stronger media literacy. In today’s information environment:
Readers must become their own fact-checkers.
Journalists must resist amplifying unverified claims.
Platforms must work to curb the spread of misleading content.
Ultimately, informed citizens are better equipped to engage in democracy.
Was Charlie Kirk’s wife confirmed to a Utah position?
No verified evidence supports this claim. No official announcements have been made.
Her name is Erika Frantzve Kirk. She is known for her civic, nonprofit, and faith-based involvement.
Her public profile and civic work may have been exaggerated online, combined with vague headlines designed for clicks.
How can I verify political appointment news?
Always check official government sources and trusted news outlets before sharing.
Unverified political claims can distort public understanding and fuel misinformation.
FAQs About the Utah Confirmation Rumor
The viral headline claiming “30 minutes ago in Utah, Charlie Kirk’s wife was confirmed as…” may have captured attention, but the evidence does not support it. No official confirmation exists, and no Utah records list Erika Kirk in a government role.
What the story reveals, however, is the speed at which rumors spread online—and the importance of verifying claims before reacting. Erika Kirk remains an active civic leader, but there is no factual basis for saying she has been appointed to public office in Utah.
As with many viral stories, the truth is more complex, and the real lesson lies not in the rumor itself but in how we respond to it. By checking sources, demanding accuracy, and resisting the lure of vague headlines, readers can strengthen both their understanding and the health of democratic conversation.
The photo looked perfect. The timing was electric. The stakes could not be higher. On election night, as the Trump dynasty gathered at Mar-a-Lago to celebrate a political resurrection, one face was missing — and that absence set off a firestorm.
Melania Trump, once the poised shadow at Donald’s side, was simply… gone. Speculation exploded, loyalties were questio…
Melania Trump’s Absence From Election Night Photo
Melania Trump’s absence from the viral Mar-a-Lago family photo crystallized what has been building quietly. While Donald Trump leans into his second act campaign for years: a woman stepping away from a role she never truly wanted. While Donald Trump leans into his second-act campaign, Melania appears to be writing a different script, one centered on privacy, motherhood, and distance from the relentless spectacle that defines his world.
Her silence has become its own kind of power. By refusing to play the traditional political spouse, she challenges expectations of what a First Lady should be: ever-present, ever-smiling, ever-available. Whether she ultimately returns to Washington or remains in Palm Beach, her choice will echo far beyond one marriage. It will test how much autonomy a presidential spouse is allowed — and how much mystery the public is willing to accept from the woman who, by saying almost nothing, may be saying the most.
The State Department has identified multiple birth tourism networks operating overseas, according to a Wednesday report.
Advertisement As a result, U. S. embassies in West Africa, Europe, and North Africa uncovered evidence of several schemes allegedly designed to generate false records and help foreign nationals travel to the United States for the purpose of giving birth on American soil.
The Daily Wire was the first outlet to report on the existence of the networks.
Advertisement The State Department shut down this birth tourism network and revoked the foreign nationals’ visas, the outlet reported.
State Department Takes Action on Birth Tourism
In addition, the department is coordinating with local authorities to “systematically identify and cut off any similar operations. ”
Advertisement “Under President Trump, the State Department is defending the integrity of U.S
“Under President Trump, the State Department is defending the integrity of U. S. citizenship by ending illegal birth tourism schemes,” said State Department messaging seen by The Daily Wire.
“No foreigner is permitted to obtain a visitor visa for the primary purpose of acquiring U. S. citizenship for a child by giving birth in the U.
S. ,” the message said, per the outlet.
Embassies Identify Hundreds of Suspected Cases
One U. S. embassy in Europe identified more than 400 suspected birth tourism cases dating back to 2024.
Investigators allegedly linked the activity to at least six companies that were coaching visa applicants on how to answer interview questions, arranging accommodations and coordinating plans for childbirth in the United States, said The Daily Wire
According to the report, State Department officials disrupted the operation, revoked the visas involved and imposed permanent travel bans on several individuals accused of participating in the scheme, barring them from entering the United States in the future.
A U. S. embassy in North Africa revoked more than 100 visas issued to individuals accused of traveling to the United States for the primary purpose of giving birth to children who would automatically receive American citizenship.
Enforcement Efforts Continue Globally
According to the report, State Department consular officers partnered with law enforcement agencies and used data analysis tools to identify networks allegedly exploiting the visa system and facilitating the practice, said the report
“A U. S. visa is a privilege, not a right,” the State Department messaging said.
“The State Department is taking action around the world to stop this abuse, dismantle birth tourism networks, and hold accountable those who try to scam our system,” it added, per the outlet.
The Daily Wire previously investigated cases of birth tourism in Texas
Texas Case and Trump Executive Order
There, the state sued De’Ai Postpartum Care Center in Houston for “exploiting birthright citizenship by unlawfully facilitating the invasion of Chinese nationals … for the sole purpose of giving birth. ”
The center stands accused of facilitating births of more than 1,000 babies, who become American citizens immediately.
President Donald Trump quickly signed an executive order to end birthright citizenship after taking office in January 2025
However, the order has faced multiple legal challenges and has been repeatedly paused as a result. The Supreme Court is expected to issue a ruling on the order in late June or early July.
Supreme Court to Rule on Birthright Citizenship
“We are the only Country in the World STUPID enough to allow ‘Birthright’ Citizenship! ” Trump noted on social media the day the high court heard oral arguments in the case.
Courtroom observers said most justices seemed skeptical of the order and viewed the Constitution’s language on the issue, contained within the Fourteenth Amendment, as plain and clear
Trump became the first sitting U. S. president to attend a Supreme Court hearing.
Justice Ketanji Brown-Jackson left many scratching their heads with a confusing and frankly bizarre response to the Trump administration’s arguments in defending the order.
And what it means is that if I steal someone’s wallet in Japan, the Japanese authorities can arrest me and prosecute me,” Jackson said.
“The latest signs are encouraging, but I’m not popping champagne yet,” Rubio said Friday.
“I don’t want to exaggerate it, but there’s been a little bit of movement, and that’s good,” he said, while stressing he doesn’t “want to be overly optimistic.”
Behind the scenes, Pakistan is again stepping into the middle.
Pakistan’s Intermediary Role
As Islamabad seeks to keep the discussions going, Pakistan’s Army Chief Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir, identified by security sources as a major intermediary between Washington and Tehran, is heading to Tehran for consultations with Iranian officials.
Rubio’s measured tone carries a stark red line: Iran’s efforts to impose what it terms a “tolling system” in the Strait of Hormuz.
Rubio called the notion a nonstarter, saying it would make diplomacy difficult and would reach well beyond the region.
Iran’s Tolling System Rejected
“No one in the world is in favor of the tolling system,” Rubio said. “It can’t happen. It would be unacceptable.”
“It would make a diplomatic deal unfeasible if they were to continue to pursue that. So it’s a threat to the world if they were trying to do that, and it’s completely illegal,” Rubio added.
The pressure point remains the Strait of Hormuz.
Global Oil Trade at Risk
The small river transports almost a fifth of global oil exports, and disruptions have unsettled markets and governments with shipments slowed and costs rising. Iran claims ownership over the strait and says it will only completely reopen it if it can charge commercial vessels to pass through.
“If Tehran refuses to reopen the route, the US and its partners can’t just sit around and hope for the best,” Rubio added. “If Iran keeps digging in, Washington has to have a Plan B,” he warned.
The greater region is tense as well. Israeli strikes have killed more than 3,100 people in Lebanon since March 2, as combat with Iran-backed Hezbollah has persisted despite a U.S.-brokered ceasefire imposed in mid-April, Lebanon’s health ministry said Friday.
Regional Tensions Escalate
Lebanon and Israel have had discussions in Washington, with another session anticipated in June, but Hezbollah has rejected the truce and opposes the meetings.
Diplomatically, the European Union on Friday also attempted to broaden its framework of sanctions on Iran to go after those behind the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, declaring the blockade “contrary to international law.”
The EU said the move would mean travel bans and asset freezes, and limits on EU citizens and companies making cash available to those identified.
Trump’s Cautious Optimism
Fox News anchor Bret Baier said President Trump told him he was “cautiously optimistic” about the United States reaching a deal with Iran.
“We’re in the middle of this — what the president is looking at on this proposal, this one-pager, this memorandum of understanding, I talked to him today, and there was this sense of optimism, not — I would say cautious optimism that they maybe get to a deal within a week,” Baier said on “America Reports.”
“However, at the same time, you have the United Nations, Iran has introduced a new mechanism, the Persian Gulf Strait Authority, to regulate maritime transit through the strategic Strait of Hormuz. That’s according to Iranian state media,” Baier added.
“Under the system, vessels intending to pass through the strait will receive guidance from an official email address outlining the rules for transit. Ships are required to comply with the framework and obtain prior authorization before crossing the waterway.’ That doesn’t seem like that’s going to fly,” Baier continued.
Shock rippled across social media today after alarming claims began circulating that former U.S. President Donald Trump had been “shot again” in Washington, D.C. The dramatic wording spread rapidly across platforms, sparking panic, speculation, and a flood of reactions from supporters and critics alike. Within hours, however, the truth behind the viral claim became clearer – and far less sensational than the rumors suggested. Despite the intensity of the online posts, no credible news organization, law-enforcement agency, Secret Service statement, or hospital report has confirmed any new attack on Donald Trump in Washington or anywhere else.
Federal authorities also remain silent on any such emergency – a strong indication that the story is not based on real events. Much of the confusion appears to stem from recycled footage, misleading captions, and click-driven posts designed to generate fear and engagement rather than provide verified information.
Several of the viral posts traced back to unverified social accounts and private groups, where dramatic language is often used without evidence.
Distinguishing Rumor from Reality
In the current digital environment, where misinformation can spread faster than official updates, such false alarms are becoming increasingly common. It is important to distinguish this rumor from the very real and widely documented assassination attempt that occurred in 2024 at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, where Trump was wounded but survived.
That incident led to sweeping security changes, federal investigations, and a criminal case that remains part of the public record. Since then, there have been heightened security protocols around the former president, with multiple foiled threats reported – but no confirmed new shooting incident as described in today’s viral claims.
Security Concerns and Misinformation Dangers
Security experts warn that false reports like these can have serious consequences. They can cause unnecessary panic, overwhelm emergency services with inquiries, mislead the public, and erode trust in real news reporting. They also place added strain on public safety agencies that must repeatedly respond to rumors instead of real emergencies.
Political analysts note that high-profile figures like Trump remain constant targets for misinformation, especially during election seasons and periods of national tension.
Sensational headlines are often crafted to trigger emotional reactions, encouraging users to share before verifying.
The Importance of Verification
In many cases, the goal is not to inform, but to generate clicks, outrage, or division. For now, all available verified information confirms that Donald Trump has not been shot again, in Washington or elsewhere. Officials urge the public to rely only on trusted news outlets and confirmed government statements for developments involving national security or public safety.
As this incident shows, not everything labeled “breaking news” online is real. In an age where a single unverified post can reach millions in minutes, caution, verification, and patience remain the most reliable defenses against panic and deception.
In Los Angeles, Malia Obama has once again found herself at the center of public attention following a significant personal and professional announcement that many observers believe marks a turning point in her life and career. As the eldest daughter of former President Barack Obama and former First Lady Michelle Obama, Malia grew up under an extraordinary spotlight. Yet despite the unique pressures that came with being part of one of America’s most recognizable families, she has spent recent years quietly building a path defined by her own ambitions and creative interests.
Since leaving the White House, Malia has largely avoided the political arena that made her family famous. Instead, she has pursued opportunities in film and television, developing a reputation for maintaining a thoughtful and independent approach to her work. Friends and industry insiders have often described her as deeply passionate about storytelling and committed to establishing herself based on talent and dedication rather than family connections.
Her latest announcement is being viewed as another milestone in that journey. Supporters and cultural commentators alike have described the development as evidence that Malia is increasingly stepping into her own identity, separate from the legacy associated with her parents. The news has sparked renewed interest in her future and generated widespread discussion about the role she may play in shaping modern entertainment and culture.
Malia Obama’s Path to Independence
For Barack and Michelle Obama, the moment represents another chapter in watching their daughters transition fully into adulthood. Throughout the years, both parents have emphasized the importance of allowing Malia and her younger sister, Sasha, to build lives independent of politics and public expectations. Their encouragement of creativity, education, and self-expression has been evident in the paths both daughters have chosen.
Malia’s growing presence in the entertainment world comes at a time when audiences are increasingly interested in fresh voices and diverse perspectives. Her experiences, combined with a global outlook shaped by her upbringing, have given rise to expectations that she could make meaningful contributions to storytelling and creative expression. Whether through writing, producing, or other artistic pursuits, many believe she possesses the potential to influence conversations far beyond Hollywood.
The announcement has also highlighted the changing public perception of Malia Obama. Once known primarily as a child growing up in the White House, she is now being recognized as a young professional forging her own future. Admirers point to her measured approach to fame and her determination to remain focused on her goals despite constant public curiosity.
Looking Ahead for Malia Obama
As this new chapter unfolds, attention will undoubtedly remain on her next moves. Yet those closest to the Obama family have consistently stressed that Malia’s greatest priority has never been publicity, but rather pursuing meaningful work and creating an identity built on her own accomplishments. With growing opportunities ahead and increasing recognition within creative circles, many believe the years to come could prove especially significant for Malia Obama and her emerging legacy in entertainment and culture.
In private, the conversations were quieter than the headlines suggested. No slammed doors, no dramatic ultimatums—just two people who had once promised each other everything, now sitting at opposite ends of the same couch, struggling to recognize the lives they had built. Their children, now old enough to read every cruel comment online, asked questions no parent could easily answer: Was it real? Were you ever happy? Did we miss the signs?
The Hidden Truth Behind Public Statements
The public demanded a narrative—betrayal, ambition, revenge—but the truth was far less cinematic and far more devastating. Years of postponed talks, unspoken resentments, and sacrifices made “for the campaign” had finally come due. When the statement was released—measured, polished, painfully careful—it hid the simplest reality: sometimes even the strongest-looking partnerships don’t explode. They quietly run out of ways to hold each other together.
The State Department has identified multiple birth tourism networks operating overseas, according to a Wednesday report.
As a result, U. S. embassies in West Africa, Europe, and North Africa uncovered evidence of several schemes allegedly designed to generate false records and help foreign nationals travel to the United States for the purpose of giving birth on American soil.
The Daily Wire was the first outlet to report on the existence of the networks.
The State Department shut down this birth tourism network and revoked the foreign nationals’ visas, the outlet reported.
Networks Identified Across Multiple Regions
In addition, the department is coordinating with local authorities to “systematically identify and cut off any similar operations.”
“Under President Trump, the State Department is defending the integrity of U.S. citizenship by ending illegal birth tourism schemes,” said State Department messaging seen by The Daily Wire.
“No foreigner is permitted to obtain a visitor visa for the primary purpose of acquiring U. S. citizenship for a child by giving birth in the U. S.,” the message said, per the outlet.
One U. S. embassy in Europe identified more than 400 suspected birth tourism cases dating back to 2024.
Investigation Uncovers Coaching Networks
Investigators allegedly linked the activity to at least six companies that were coaching visa applicants on how to answer interview questions, arranging accommodations and coordinating plans for childbirth in the United States, said The Daily Wire.
According to the report, State Department officials disrupted the operation, revoked the visas involved and imposed permanent travel bans on several individuals accused of participating in the scheme, barring them from entering the United States in the future.
A U. S. embassy in North Africa revoked more than 100 visas issued to individuals accused of traveling to the United States for the primary purpose of giving birth to children who would automatically receive American citizenship.
According to the report, State Department consular officers partnered with law enforcement agencies and used data analysis tools to identify networks allegedly exploiting the visa system and facilitating the practice, said the report.
State Department Takes Action Worldwide
“A U. S. visa is a privilege, not a right,” the State Department messaging said.
“The State Department is taking action around the world to stop this abuse, dismantle birth tourism networks, and hold accountable those who try to scam our system,” it added, per the outlet.
The Daily Wire previously investigated cases of birth tourism in Texas.
There, the state sued De’Ai Postpartum Care Center in Houston for “exploiting birthright citizenship by unlawfully facilitating the invasion of Chinese nationals … for the sole purpose of giving birth.”
Birthright Citizenship Executive Order Faces Legal Challenges
The center stands accused of facilitating births of more than 1,000 babies, who become American citizens immediately.
President Donald Trump quickly signed an executive order to end birthright citizenship after taking office in January 2025.
However, the order has faced multiple legal challenges and has been repeatedly paused as a result. The Supreme Court is expected to issue a ruling on the order in late June or early July.
“We are the only Country in the World STUPID enough to allow ‘Birthright’ Citizenship!” Trump noted on social media the day the high court heard oral arguments in the case.
Courtroom observers said most justices seemed skeptical of the order and viewed the Constitution’s language on the issue, contained within the Fourteenth Amendment, as plain and clear.
Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Birthright Citizenship
Trump became the first sitting U. S. president to attend a Supreme Court hearing.
Justice Ketanji Brown-Jackson left many scratching their heads with a confusing and frankly bizarre response to the Trump administration’s arguments in defending the order.
And what it means is that if I steal someone’s wallet in Japan, the Japanese authorities can arrest me and prosecute me,” Jackson said.
ADVERTISEMENT
